suiboxer.xyz

Sui Kiosk vs Aptos Token Objects for NFT Royalties: Which Approach Works Better?

Sui Kiosk and Aptos Token Objects offer different mechanisms for enforcing NFT royalties, and the right choice depends on whether you need on-chain enforcement, flexibility for marketplace integration, or simpler implementation. Sui Kiosk provides a built-in royalty system with optional enforcement at the marketplace level, while Aptos Token Objects require developers to implement royalty logic manually using the token object's mutable properties. Neither approach guarantees royalties across all marketplaces by default.

How sui kiosk handles royalties

Sui Kiosk is a standard module in the Sui framework that manages the transfer and sale of digital assets. It includes a royalty mechanism built into the kiosk's transfer policies.

The Royalty Rule

When you create a kiosk for a collection, you can attach a royalty rule that specifies a percentage fee on secondary sales. This rule is enforced when a buyer purchases an item through the kiosk's purchase function. The fee is taken at the time of sale and sent to a designated beneficiary address.

Key characteristics:

Limitations

How aptos token objects handle royalties

Aptos Token Objects are a flexible standard that allows developers to define custom properties on each token. Royalties are not built into the standard. Instead, you must implement royalty logic using the token object's mutable fields and the Aptos framework's token module.

Implementing royalties with token objects

You can add a royalty percentage and beneficiary address as properties of the token object during minting. Then, when a transfer or sale occurs, your smart contract checks these properties and deducts the royalty fee.

Typical implementation steps:

  1. Define a royalty field in the token object's struct, storing the percentage and beneficiary.
  2. Create a transfer function that calculates the royalty amount, sends it to the beneficiary, and transfers the token.
  3. Require all marketplaces to call your custom transfer function instead of using the default direct_transfer function.

Challenges

Key Differences

Aspect Sui Kiosk Aptos Token Objects
Built-in royalty system Yes, as a kiosk rule No, must implement manually
On-chain enforcement Only within kiosk purchase flow Only within custom transfer functions
Marketplace adoption Several major Sui marketplaces support kiosk royalties Adoption depends on your custom integration
Flexibility Fixed percentage per collection You can vary royalties per token or add custom logic
Bypass risk High: direct transfers avoid kiosk High: direct transfers avoid custom functions

Which one should you use?

Choose Sui Kiosk if:

Choose Aptos Token Objects if:

Practical considerations for both chains

Sui

Aptos

Summary

Sui Kiosk offers a simpler, standardised approach to royalties with less custom code required, but it only works within the kiosk ecosystem. Aptos Token Objects give you full control at the cost of more development work and marketplace coordination. Neither system guarantees royalty enforcement across all trading scenarios. If on-chain royalty enforcement is critical, you may need to restrict transfers to only your approved functions, which limits interoperability. For most projects, the practical choice depends on which chain's ecosystem and marketplace support aligns better with your goals.

Not financial advice. suiboxer.xyz publishes market data and general information about digital assets. Crypto assets are volatile and you can lose everything you put in. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold, and we make no price predictions.

Prices are sourced from third parties and may be delayed or wrong. Verify anything you intend to act on against a primary source.

Back to sui & aptos